The MedPAC Blog

Factors increasing Part D spending for catastrophic benefits

by MedPAC Staff | Jun 08, 2017

Factors increasing Part D spending for catastrophic benefits

In the March Report to Congress, we discussed the status of the Medicare Part D program. In 2015, Medicare spent $80 billion under Part D, and enrollees paid an additional $11.5 billion in premiums and $15 billion in cost sharing. Some of Medicare’s payments to plans came in the form of monthly prospective amounts for each enrollee (adjusted for risk), and also as open-ended retrospective payments for enrollees with high drug spending, called individual reinsurance.[1] When combined, those Medicare payments are supposed to pay for 74.5 percent of the cost of basic benefits, and enrollees pay the remainder in premiums.

From 2010 to 2017, Medicare spending on the monthly prospective payments grew rather slowly, and average premiums for Medicare Part D enrollees remained between $30 and $31 per month. However, Medicare spending on reinsurance payments for enrollees with high drug costs grew on average more than 20% per year since 2010. In this blog post, we discuss several factors that have contributed to that high growth in recent years.

Part D has a unique benefit structure. A Part D plan’s liability varies as an enrollee’s drug spending increases during the course of a year. After an enrollee reaches the OOP threshold (at about $8,100 in gross drug spending in 2017), the plan is only responsible for covering 15% of any additional spending. Medicare covers 80% of the remaining spending by making reinsurance payments, and the beneficiary is responsible for 5%. This benefit design can create incentives for a plan to include certain high-cost drugs on their formulary over others, which can increase Medicare spending for reinsurance. We discuss these incentives more later in this post, and additional information about the design of the Part D benefit also can be found here.

CMS has pointed to another factor that has both moderated Part D premiums while increasing Medicare’s reinsurance payments—expanding amounts of “direct and indirect remuneration (DIR),” the agency’s term for manufacturers’ rebates, pharmacy fees, and other price concessions that lower costs after the point of sale. In 2014, DIR totaled $17.4 billion, of which manufacturer rebates made up $16.3 billion. According to the Medicare trustees, DIR grew from 8.6 percent of gross Part D drug spending in 2006 to 17.2 percent in 2015. As CMS notes, larger shares of DIR mean greater differences between gross prices at the point of sale and the net financial obligation of plan sponsors. Rising prices have contributed to the expansion of DIR, which has in turn contributed to both slow growth in premiums and fast growth in reinsurance payments. Premiums and fixed-dollar copayments are lower for all enrollees when plan sponsors offset their benefit costs with DIR. However, enrollees who instead pay coinsurance for their prescriptions do not see any reduction to their cost sharing because coinsurance is based on the price before any DIR is applied. The OOP threshold is based on the higher (gross) price. This contributes to more beneficiaries exceeding that OOP threshold and increases Medicare’s payments for reinsurance. Increased DIR has mixed effects on beneficiaries. On the one hand, beneficiaries experience lower premiums, but on the other hand, they tend to incur higher cost sharing.

MedPAC Commissioners were briefed earlier this year on factors that are pushing Part D toward higher spending for catastrophic benefits, and we highlight three here. First, prices for brand-name drugs have grown aggressively (reflecting increases by manufacturers and the move toward new drugs with high launch prices), overwhelming the moderating influence of generics. Second, Part D requires manufacturers to provide a 50 percent discount on brand-name drugs for enrollees in the coverage gap. Under law, the discount is added to the enrollee’s OOP spending, so beneficiaries reach the OOP threshold faster. Third, retiring baby boomers are expanding the number of enrollees.

A final factor behind the push toward more catastrophic benefits in Part D may be an unintended consequence of Part D’s benefit structure that may provide financial incentives for plan sponsors to put some higher priced drugs on their formularies. The slide below comes from MedPAC’s January meeting and presents an example of those incentives.[2] In some cases, sponsors’ decisions to place certain higher-price drugs on their formularies are a response to the financial incentives they face.

From 2010 to 2017, Medicare spending on the monthly prospective payments grew rather slowly, and average premiums for Medicare Part D enrollees remained between $30 and $31 per month. However, Medicare spending on reinsurance payments for enrollees with high drug costs grew on average more than 20% per year since 2010. In this blog post, we discuss several factors that have contributed to that high growth in recent years.

The slide shows a comparison for a sponsor deciding whether to include a drug with a list price of $60,000 and a 25 percent rebate on its formulary (shown in the column titled “Brand #1) or a $30,000 drug that also offers a 25 percent rebate (shown in the column titled “Brand #2). The middle panel illustrates the financial implications of the two drugs today under the current program design. Because today plan sponsors are responsible for paying only 15% of spending after an enrollee exceeds the OOP threshold, it can be financially beneficial to the plan to include a higher-priced drug on its formulary. In the example on the slide, the rebate and reinsurance amounts are so large that the sponsor could actually reduce its plan liability (and help lower its premiums or increase profits) by placing the more expensive drug (Brand #1) on its formulary. The middle panel illustrates that the plan can actually reduce its net liability by $287 by selecting Brand #1, the more expensive drug. By comparison, the plan would face a net cost of $713 for the lower priced medicine. Under that scenario, reinsurance payments by the Medicare program would be higher ($37,729 compared to $15,729). Cost sharing paid by the beneficiary would also be higher ($5,489 vs. $3.989).

In June 2016, the Commission recommended changes to Part D that would reduce Medicare’s reinsurance from 80 percent to 20 percent, among other changes. Those recommendations would ameliorate the financial incentives shown in the middle panel of the slide. If Medicare’s reinsurance was reduced to 20 percent, the sponsor would face much higher costs if it placed the more expensive brand on its formulary. The bottom panel illustrates how the plan’s financial incentives change under the recommendation. Now, the plan faces net costs of $28,010 for selecting Brand #1, compared with net costs of $12,510 for selecting Brand #2. By selecting the lower-priced medicine, beneficiaries who use that drug would also experience lower cost sharing ($3,989 rather than $5,489, and shown in the top panel because beneficiary’s cost sharing is based on the drug price). Medicare would also make lower reinsurance payments when the plan chose the lower priced medicine ($12,510 compared with $28,010).

Overall, MedPAC expects that this recommendation would reduce Medicare spending under Part D, by providing plans with better financial incentives to include lower-priced drugs in their formularies. Beneficiaries would also benefit from lower cost sharing if they selected those lower-priced drugs. “Lastly, because Medicare’s overall subsidy would be the same, plans would receive higher monthly fixed-dollar payments when they assume responsibility for more spending in the catastrophic portion of the benefit. [3]



[1] Medicare’s remaining spending under Part D was for the retiree drug subsidy and the low-income subsidy.

[2] Other research organizations have made similar observations about these incentives to include higher-priced drugs on formularies, such as a study conducted by Milliman.

[3] To keep Medicare’s overall subsidy at 74.5 percent, and alleviate premium increases, Medicare would increase plans’ monthly capitated payments. CMS would also need to recalibrate its Part D risk adjustment system for the capitated payments.

7 comments

Leave a comment
  1. bhangad singh | Jul 23, 2017
    How Brawl Stars Cheats Assist You to Win Game ... How to Get Free Brawl Stars Gems- If the hack tool comprises of Brawl Stars Generator, online tool will help you out.
  2. Self Car Insurance | Jul 20, 2017
    Nice post http://www.selfcarinsurance.com
  3. Self Car Insurance | Jul 20, 2017
    Nice post http://www.selfcarinsurance.com
  4. sachin | Jul 11, 2017
  5. Loni | Jul 01, 2017
  6. Sonja Wolfe | Jun 28, 2017
    For shorter statured people, sometimes they have a shorter canal and the Diva Cup is too long. I figured out how to get it in pretty well, I think. But a menstrual cup provides ladies with an reciprocal to these traditional methods. You may have to buy more than one if the first is just not forming a good suction, but I promise it’s a admirable investment to digit it out! I would never go back. However, I do not feel like my cup sits any lower at all than a tampon. It seems like I’m super prosperous, but I didn’t have any trial period of getting it right at all. HOWEVER, I was wondering how do you sterilize the cupful when traveling? I love to go too, but after I bought my cup I realized that BOILING it on the road is the one thing I could consider a downside. She just tried it out for the first time too while on vacation and she had no problems or messy trial age either. The first silicone menstrual revelry was the UK-manufactured Mooncup. I have the model 1 because I bought it before I was 30 and it still fits well. Think of your relationship with tampons as a guide (can you use them, can you take a super, etc). The DivaCup is the menstrual cup most people start with, but we think it’s actually not a great starter cup because it’s one of the longest cups we touchstone. Petite favor have reported that they raise the Lunette. Maybe that was your problem? I wash mine with a non-oil-supported hinder soap and if it's discolored, I add baking soda to the boiling water when sanitizing. Yes, this disgraceful you might have to spend an extra $30, but remember, if you find one you like, you’re still saving money in the extensive run.Share this article via electronic mail 1 / 2 2 / 2 Left Arrow Previous Right Arrow Next Tired of Tampons? Here Are Pros and Cons of Menstrual Cups For years, ladies have usefulness either tampons or pads to collect blood and preserve covering during their periods. Most menstrual cups are now manufactured from medical grade silicone long of its durability and hypoallergenic properties, though there are also brands made of TPE (thermoplastic elastomer). Menstrual cups are becoming more popular universal, with many separate brands, shapes and sizes on the market.AshSunday, December 21, 2014I've auricular castille downplay (or any oil-based soap) and silicone assume't mix well and cause the silicone to disgrace. I love my Diva Cup and they tell you that if you’ve had a child or are over 30 you extremity the model 2 (which is a bit bigger circumference). I got my mom a cup the same time I bought mine. DeleteTlindaT April 18, 2014 at 10:44 am # I’m on day two of using my Diva cup for the very first time and I already know that I won’t go back to other products. I’ll truly estimate to hear (read) about your share on is matter. Then go read on some of those forums for more tips on cull the correct kind and size. To* From* Yes! Send me crack insights each week in Health Essentials News SubmitWhen I first started using a menstrual cup, Diva Cup was the only brand on the market (or at least that I was aware of).  After going through my inferior Diva Cup (each last 5 years each), I am now using the Dutchess Cup. Not sure why…. In general you are choosing two stuff, the beam of the cup so that it will open wide enough and beauty a circular suction in your vaginal channel, and the length — these two stuff vary with each cup. But if you have a high cervix, the DivaCup works really well, is smooth and comfortable, and holds a lot of blood. It does have a hollow stem, which can collect descent and gunk easier than those with solid flame, but we assume’t cogitate that’s a dealbreaker.These are all just general guides, and remember that vaginas are inherently stretchy (they are designed to suitable a baby through them, after all). Not a drop outside the cupful all day today. Advertising Policy Cleveland Clinic is a no-profit academic medical center. But maybe that’s just me.The Tassette team came up with one last Hail Mary to redeem the production — a re-designed cup that more closely resembled its phenomenally successful competitor. Unfortunately, with things like menstrual cups it does take some attempt and error. No leakage all night. (Another Kickstarter for a so-called “smart menstrual cup” that measures fluid level has raised plenty in donations, despite being astonishingly unnecessary.) At hunger last, these advocates have helped the menstrual cup inscribe the mainstream like never before.Hi! First of all, thank you for this article! It comforts me reading that is was difficult at the enterprise… (I’ve normal bought it and used it on one period). The frank discussions have yielded practical issue: In the past few donkey’s, DivaCup is now carried by massive chains like REI, Whole Foods, and CVS, and LilyCup debauchee in thousands on a Kickstarter to develop a discreet cup that pen into a compact. Which means that anyone who has a medium or short cervix might find it uncomfortable. any ideas??? LikeLike. :)Just tested the Luna portion, got both sizes, so tried the small for the first time. It comes in a 2 pack so is a better converse.  They are almost exactly the same except that the Diva Cup seems to hold its shape better, so it opens up easier when I inset it.  Even though the Dutchess Cup is a slighty better deal, I will buy a Diva Cup when it is time to get a new menstrual cup.In 1987, another latex rubber menstrual cup, The Keeper, was artificial in the United States. The Tassaway was designed to do two things — sell a greater quantity of one and appeal to women who had come to look for their menstrual products to be disposable.“Women are recount flow, and how to insert it … they’re not beating around the shrub. I put it in and it just manufacture perfectly. There’s definitely a lifestyle element,” Zivku says. This proved to be the first commercially viable monthly cup and it is still available today. In 1969, the company debuted the Tassaway: a thinner, flimsier, and, unlike its forebear, made for one-day use model. Some are long-continuance and reusable, while others are disposable. No mess while changing it this morning. However, after being in for about 1/2 stound I dislocate to feel crampy. Thanks a lot, Elsa.
  7. DealsBevy | Jun 23, 2017

    This is great, you are good, i like your post and i still waiting our next post.

    Coupon Codes Amarley Coupons American Flags Coupons AtmosRX Coupons Azores Getaways Coupons Bag Inc Coupons BeautifiedYou.com Coupons BeddingInn Coupons Bein Harim Tours Coupons Biogetica Coupons Blushfashion Coupons Box Of Challenge Coupons Brooklyn Bedding Coupons Buy Emergency Foods Coupons Candy Club Coupons Canna-Pet Coupons Carhartt Coupons Cherry Servers Coupons CLE Holistic Health Coupons ComboInk Coupons CoolGlow Coupons CorpNet Coupons Corporate Housing by Owner Coupons Crystal Kayak Coupons Decor Island Coupons DentalPlans.com Coupons DIYthemes Coupons Dreamfoam Bedding Coupons DressWe Coupons Edureka Coupons Eight Sleep Coupons Fairy Season Coupons Fine Rug Collection Coupons Flags Connections Coupons FlexiSpot Coupons FORBES & LEWIS Coupons Fossil Farms Coupons GDF Studio Coupons GiftCards.com Coupons Ginger Software Coupons Glasses Shop Coupons GlowSource Coupons Gold Medal Wine Club Coupons GroupMail Coupons Half Price Drapes Coupons Hansen Wholesale Coupons Hawaii Coffee Company Coupons HCG Drops Direct Coupons HealthyWage Coupons Heimdal Security Coupons HgH.com Coupons Hollywood Psychics Coupons HottPerfume.com Coupons Hurom Coupons IKREMA Coupons In The Swim Coupons Jacob Bromwell Coupons Jeulia Coupons Karina Dresses Coupons KatanaFire Coupons KD Smart Chair Coupons Keen.com Coupons Keetsa Coupons Kiiroo Coupons Koa Coffee Coupons Kobelli Coupons Kolibree Coupons Kurves By Kimi Coupons Life Extension Coupons LifeFone Coupons Lushes Curtains Coupons Mailbox Forwarding Coupons Maykke Coupons Misfit Coupons MyProtein USA Coupons Nesh NYC Coupons Nest Bedding Coupons Nolah Sleep Coupons NY Designer Fabrics Coupons Official HCG Diet Plan Coupons PangeaBed Coupons Parrot.com Coupons Petcube Coupons PicoBrew Coupons Plant Therapy Coupons Pod Trackers Coupons Popreal Coupons POSH Mommy Coupons Premier Dead Sea Coupons Primal Muscle Coupons Progressive Automations Coupons Resumes Planet Coupons ResumeWritingService.BIZ Coupons Ron Herman Coupons ScentBox Coupons Sewing Machines Plus Coupons ShindigZ Coupons Simplilearn Coupons Sisquoc Healthcare Coupons SoClean Coupons Soul Electronics Coupons Sparxx Rx Coupons Swimsuits For All Coupons TestCountry Coupons The RTA Store Coupons TheHungryJPEG.com Coupons Thorne Research Coupons Thrive Market Coupons TicketNetwork Coupons TomatoInk Coupons TriSports Coupons TYENT USA Coupons Vaped Coupons VaporDNA Coupons Verizon Wireless Coupons VIKING BAGS Coupons VOLCANO e-Cigs Coupons WellnessFX Coupons Winc Coupons Wine of the Month Club Coupons 1&1 Web Hosting Coupons 3 Day Blinds Coupons

    Leave a comment

    Next Public Meeting

    PRESS ROOM

    For the latest news and press releases from MedPAC


    Click Here

    Join Our Mailing List

    Sign up to recieve e-mail notices of Commission meetings and new posts to our website.

    Sign Up Now

    Filter posts by subject